Economic Evaluation of Different Culture Enclosures for Musca domestica Larval Production and Their Utilization for Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Fingerlings Diets


  • Asiata A. KOLAWOLE Federal University of Kashere, Department of Biological Sciences, Gombe State (NG)
  • Adiaha Alda Alex UGWUMBA University of Ibadan, Hydrobiology and Fisheries Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Ibadan, Oyo State (NG)



Clarias gariepinus; cost-effectiveness; culture enclosures; growth rate; larval production; nutrient utilization


The study was designed to investigate the rate of larval (maggot) production from different culture enclosures, as well as to compare the cost effectiveness and utilization of the maggot in the diet of African mud catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Musca domestica larvae were cultured from poultry dung for five week, where upon they were utilized as a replacement for fish meal in the diet of fingerlings of African mud catfish. The maggots were cultured in four different enclosures: aluminium mobile maggotry, aluminium, plastic and wooden boxes. The harvested maggots were processed by oven drying and powdered as maggot meal. The maggot meal was used to substitute fish meal in eight diets with different inclusion levels of 0% (control), 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70% and 80%. The formulated diets were fed to C. gariepinus fingerlings in triplicates for 10 weeks. The growth, nutrient utilization and survival of fish were monitored during the experimental period. The cost effectiveness of different culture enclosure was studied. Results indicate that aluminium box was the best option, giving the highest weight of maggot production, and was the most cost effective of all the culture enclosures studied. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were recorded in weight gain of fish between the control and the maggot meal-based diets, while the highest weight gain was observed in fish fed 70% maggot meal-based diet. Specific and relative growth rates were found to be high in fish fed 60% maggot meal diet, while they were lowest in fish fed 20% maggot meal diet and the control diet. The best protein intake was recorded in fish fed the 70% maggot meal-based diet and lowest in fish fed the control diet. Survival of fish was generally high (78.3%-93.30%) and was significantly (p < 0.05) different between the fish fed as the control and the maggot meal-based diets. The study confirms that maggots of Musca domestica are suitable as partial replacement of fishmeal at 60-70% inclusion level for optimal growth performance and nutrient utilization in Clarias gariepinus fingerlings.


Metrics Loading ...


A.O.A.C. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) International. (2012). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 19th Edition. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, AOAC International pp 1230.

Abraham KO, Richard AA, Samuel A (2015). Proximate composition of housefly (Musca domestica) maggots cultured on different substrates as potential feed for Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 2(5):102-103.

Adenugba TO (2012). Production of maggots from aluminium mobile maggotry, aluminium, plastic and wooden boxes and their utilization in ‘Heteroclarias’diet. MSc. Project, Unpublished.Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Adigun BA (2005). Water quality management in aquaculture and freshwater zooplankton production for use in fish hatchery. National Institute for Freshwater Fisheries Research, New Bussa, Niger State.

Agbabiaka LA, Amadi AS, Madubuko CU, Nwankwo FC, Ojukannaiye AS (2012). Assessment of nutrients and sensory qualities of brine pre-treated catfish smoked with two different woods. African Journal of Food Science 6(9):245-248.

Ajonina AS, Nyambi RE (2013). Evaluation of growth response of Clarias gariepinus fingerling feddried maggot as protein source. International Journal Current Microbiology and Applied Science 2(5):123-129.

Akinwande AA, Ugwumba AAA, Ugwumba OA (2002). Effect of replacement of fish meal with maggot meal in the diet of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) fingerlings. The Zoologist 1:41-46.

Akpodiete OJ, Ologhobo AD, Oluyemi JA (1997). Production and nutritive value of housefly maggot meal on three substrates of poultry faeces. Journal of Applied Animal Research 12(1):101-106.

Alegbeleye WO, Anyanwu DF, Akeem AM (1991). Effect of varying dietary protein levels on the growth and utilization performance of catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of Nigerian Association of Aquatic Science Ibadan, Nigeria pp 51-53.

Anene A, Afam-Anene OC, Ike K, Ekekwe NH (2013). Preliminary investigations on quantity of maggots produced from four different sources of livestock wastes. Journal of Research in Biology 3(6):1060-1065.

Aniebo AO, Erondu ES, Owen OJ (2009). Replacement of fish meal with maggot meal in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) diets. Revista UDO Agricola 9(3):666-671.

Aniebo AO, Owen OJ (2010). Effects of age and method of drying on the proximate composition of houseflylarvae (Musca domestica linnaeus) meal (HFLM). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 9(5):485-487.

Atteh JO, Olegbenla FD (1993). Replacement of fishmeal with maggots in broiler diet: Effects on performance and nutrient retention. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 20(1):44-49.

Awoniyi TAM, Aletor VA, Aina JM (2003). Performance of broiler chickens fed on maggot meal in place of fishmeal. International Journal of Poultry Science 2(4):271-274.

Bene C, Heck S (2002). Fisheries and the millennium development goals. Solution for Africa. NAGA 28:8-13.

Boyd CE (1990). Water quality in ponds for aquaculture. Alabama Agriculture Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama pp 462.

Calvert CC, Martin RD, Morgan NO (1970). House flies pupae as food for poultry. Journal Economic Entomology 62(4).

Calvert CL (1976). Systems for indirect recycling by using animal and municipal wastes as a substrate for protein production. Chapter 8. In. Feed Resources Proceedings of Technical Consultation, FAO.

Dada AA, Akinwande AA (2005).Growth performance of Heteroclarias fed maggot meal at varying Inclusion levels. 2004 Fisheries Society of Nigeria (FISON) Conference Proceedings pp 896.

Ezewudo BI, Monebi CO, Ugwumba AAA (2015). Production and utilization of Musca domestica maggots in the diet of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) fingerlings. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10(23):2363-2371.

FAO(2012). State of the world fisheries. Rome.

FAO (2006). Nigeria’s fisheries profile. Retrieved on 2006 February 2 from

Fasakin EA, Balogun AM, Ajayi OO (2003). Evaluation of full fat and defatted maggot meals in the feeding of clariid catfish Calarias gariepinus fingerlings. Aquaculture Research 34(9):733-738.

Federal Department of Fisheries (FDF) (2007). Fisheries statistics of Nigeria. 4th Edition1995-2007 pp 49.

Gado MS, El-Aggory SM, Elgawaad AA, Mahmoud AK (1982). The possibility of applying insect protein in broiler rations. Research Bulletin-Ain-Shams University.

Hwangbo J, Hong EC, Jang A, Kang HK, Oh JS, Kim BW, Park BS (2009). Utilization of house fly-maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. Journal of Environmental Biology 30(4):609-614.

Idowu AB, Amusan AAS, Oyediran AG (2003). The response of C. gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) to the diet containing housefly maggot, (Musca domestica). Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 30(1):139-144.

Inaoka T, Okubo G, Yokota M, Takemasa M (1999). Nutritive value of house fly larvae and pupae fed on chicken faeces as food source for poultry. Japanese Poultry Science 36(3):174-180.

Jhingram VG (1983). Fish and fishes of India (2nd ed). Hindustan publishing corporation, Delhi pp 727.

Lovell T (1989). Nutrition and feeding of fish. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY, USA pp 240.

Michael KG, Sogbesan OA (2015). Evaluation of maggot meal (Musca domestica) and single cell protein (mushroom) in the diet of Clarias gariepinus fingerlings (Burchell, 1822). Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal 6(3):1.

Monebi CO, Ugwumba AAA (2013). Utilization of the earthworm (Eudrilus eugeniae) in the diet of heteroclarias fingerlings. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture 5(2):19-25.

Newton GL, Booram CV, Barker RW, Hale OM (1977). Dried Hermetia illucens larvae meal as a supplement for swine. Journal of Animal Science 44(3):395-400.

Newton L, Sheppard C, Watson D, Burtle G, Dove R (2004).Using the black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens, as a value-added tool for the management of swine manure. University of Georgia, College of Agriculture & Environmental Science. Department of Animal & Dairy Scienc, Annual Report.

Odesanya BO, Ajayi SO, Agbaogun BKO, Okuneye A (2011). Comparative evaluation of nutritive value of maggots. International Journal of Engineering Science 2(11):1-5.

Ogunji JO, Kloas W, Wirth M, Schulz C, Rennert B (2006). Housefly maggot meal (Magmeal): An emerging substitute of fishmeal in Tilapia diets. Proceedings of Conference on International Agronomy Research for Development, Stuttgart-Hohenheim, October 11-13 pp 1-7.

Ogunji J, Slawski H, Schulz C, Werner C, Wirth M (2008). Preliminary evaluation of housefly maggot meal as an alternative protein source in diet of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). World Aquaculture Society Abstract Data Aqua 2006 - Meeting Abstract 277.

Okah U, Onwujiariri EB (2012). Performance of finisher broiler chickens fed maggot meal as a replacement for fish meal. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 8(2):471-477.

Olaniyi CO, Salau BR (2013). Utilization of maggot meal in the nutrition of African cat fish. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8(37):4604-4607.

Olomola A (1990). Capture fisheries and aquaculture in Nigeria: A comparative economic analysis. Africa Rural Social Science Series Report, No. 13.Ibadan, Nigeria, University Press Ltd.

Omoyinmi GAK, Fagade SO, Adebisi AA (2005). Assessment of different organic substrates in the laboratory culture of some live food organisms. Zoologist 3:105-111.

Pellett P (1989). Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on protein quality evaluation. Bethesda, M.D., U.S.A, 4-8 December. FAO and Food Nutrition Paper pp 51-72.

Samuel AA, Nyambi RE (2013). Evaluation of growth response of Clarias gariepinus fingerling fed dried maggot as protein source. International Journal Current Microbiology and Applied Science 2(5):123-129

Sogbesan OA, Ugwumba AAA (2008). Nutritional evaluation of termite (Macrotermes subhyalinus) meal as animal protein supplements in the diets of Heterobranchus longifilis (Valenciennes, 1840) fingerlings. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 8(1):149-157.

Sogbesan AO, Ajuonu N, Musa BO, Adewole AM (2006). Harvesting techniques and evaluation of maggot meal as animal protein source for ‘Heterobranchus’ in outdoor concrete tanks. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2(4):394-402.

Sogbesan OA, Ajuonu ND, Ugwumba AAA, Madu CT (2005). Cost benefits of maggot meal as supplemented feed in the diets of Heterobranchu slongifilis x Clarias gariepinus (Pisces-Clariidae) hybrid fingerlings in outdoor concrete tanks. Journal of Industrial and Scientific Research 3(2):51-55.

Ugwumba AAA, Abumoye OO (1998). Growth response of Clarias gariepinus fingerlings fed live maggot from poultry droppings. In: Sustainable utilization of aquatic/wetland resources. Selected papers from 9th/10th Annual Conference of the Nigerian Association for Aquatic Sciences, Abeokuta, Nigeria, 30th Nov-2nd December pp 60-68.

Ugwumba AAA, Ugwumba OA, Okunola AO (2001). Utilization of live maggot as supplementary feed on the growth of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) fingerlings. Nigerian Journal of Science 35(1):1-7.

Ukanwoko AI, Olalekan OA (2015). Effects of source and time of harvest on the proximate composition of maggot (Musca domestica) larva meal. International Journal of Livestock Research 5(7):84-90.




How to Cite

KOLAWOLE, A. A., & UGWUMBA, A. A. A. (2018). Economic Evaluation of Different Culture Enclosures for Musca domestica Larval Production and Their Utilization for Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Fingerlings Diets. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 10(4), 466–474.



Research articles
DOI: 10.15835/nsb10410271