Physiological and Agronomic Responses of Four Rice Varieties to Drought in the Rainforest


  • Mamadou FOFANA Africa Rice Centre, Ibadan Sub-station
  • Lekan Suleiman SAKARIYAWO Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (FUNAAB), Department of Plant Physiology and Crop Production, P.M.B. 2240 Alabata (NG)
  • Mauton O. POPOGBE Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (FUNAAB), Department of Plant Physiology and Crop Production, P.M.B. 2240 Alabata (NG)
  • Akeem A. OYEKANMI Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (FUNAAB), Department of Plant Physiology and Crop Production, P.M.B. 2240 Alabata (NG)
  • Jamiu O. AZEEZ FUNAAB, Department of Soil Science and Land Management, P.M.B 2240 Alabata (NG)
  • Felix T. ADEGBEHINGBE Africa Rice Centre, Ibadan Sub-station (NG)



Opa reservoir occurrence; spatial variation; species richness; temporal variation zones; trophic state index


The present investigation tested the hypothesis that there would be variation in physiological responses to water deficit among rice varieties from different production ecologies, with contrasting tolerance to water deficit under repeated cycle of soil moisture deficit, at reproductive growth stage. A screen house and a field trial were conducted at International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan and Ikenne (Latitude 6° 52' N, Longitude 3° 43' E) respectively. Both experiments had rice varieties (‘IR 64’, ‘WAB 56-104’, ‘IR 77298-1-2-B-10’ and ‘NERICA 4’) and stress status (stress and control) as treatment factor’s, arranged in a randomised complete block design with three replicates. In both trials, the physiological mechanism that underpins varietal differences with repeated cycles of water deficit at the reproductive growth stage was more balanced water status, improved foliar characters, efficient photosynthetic capacity and higher grain yield in comparatively drought tolerant upland rice varieties (‘NERICA 4’ and ‘WAB 56-104’), as opposed with the results for the drought susceptible cultivar ‘IR 64’. A converse pattern was observed on water stressed rice, despite fewer cycles of water deficit on the field. The results could have suggested that the initiation of water deficit is the rate limiting step rather than its intensity at the reproductive growth stage.    


Metrics Loading ...


Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002). Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Annals of Botany 89(7):925-940.

Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002). Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Annals of Botany 89(7):925-940.

BÄ…czek-Kwinta R, Kozie A, Seidler-Lożykowska K (2011). Are the fluorescence parameters of German chamomile leaves the first indicators of the anthodia yield in drought conditions? Photosynthetica 49(1):87-97.

Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962). A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15(3):413-428.

Begg JE, Turner NC, Kramer PJ (1980). Morphological adaptations of leaves to water stress. Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress 33-42.

Blum A, Arkin GF (1984). Sorghum root growth and water-use as affected by water supply and growth duration. Field Crops Research 9:131-142.

Centritto M, Lauteri M, Monteverdi MC, Serraj R (2009). Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage. Journal of Experimental Botany 60(8):2325-2339.

Chakraborty D, Nagarajan S, Aggarwal P, Gupta V K, Tomar RK, Garg RN, Kalra N (2008). Effect of mulching on soil and plant water status, and the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management 95(12):1323-1334.

Demirevska K, Simova-Stoilova L, Vassileva V, Feller U (2008). Rubisco and some chaperone protein responses to water stress and rewatering at early seedling growth of drought sensitive and tolerant wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regulation 56(2):97-106.

Diagana B, Akindes F, Savadogo K, Reardon T, Staatz J (1999). Effects of the CFA franc devaluation on urban food consumption in West Africa: overview and cross-country comparisons. Food Policy 24(5):465-478.

Diagne A, Alia D, Amovin-Assagba E, Wopereis MC, Saito K, Nakelse T (2013). Farmer perception of biophysical constraints to rice production in sub-Sahara Africa and potential impact of research. In: Realising Africa rice promise . Nosworthy way, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX 10 8DE, UK: CABI pp 46-68.

Farooq M, Hussein M, Wahid A, Siddique KH (2012) .Plant responses to drought stress. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Ferrio JP, Pou A, Florez-sarasa I, Gessler A, Kodama N, Flexas J, Ribas-carbo M (2012). The Péclet effect on leaf water enrichment correlates with leaf hydraulic conductance and mesophyll conductance for CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 35(3):611-625.

Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L (2004). Response of seedlings of two Eucalyptus and three deciduous tree species from Ethiopia to severe water stress. Forest Ecology and Management 201(1):119-129.

Grzesiak MT, Janowiak F, Szczyrek P, Kaczanowska K, Ostrowska A, Rut G, Grzesiak S (2016). Impact of soil compaction stress combined with drought or waterlogging on physiological and biochemical markers in two maize hybrids. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38(5):1-15.

Heckathorn SA, DeLucia EH (1991). Effect of leaf rolling on gas exchange and leaf temperature of Andropogon gerardii and Spartina pectinata. Botanical Gazette 152(3):263-268.

Henry A, Cal AJ, Batoto TC, Torres RO, Serraj R (2012). Root attributes affecting water uptake of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 63(13):4751-4763.

Henry A, Swamy BM, Dixit S, Torres RD, Batoto TC, Manalili M, Kumar A (2015). Physiological mechanisms contributing to the QTL-combination effects on improved performance of IR64 rice NILs under drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 66(7):1787-1799.

Holbrook NM, Ahrens ET, Burns MJ, Zwieniecki MA (2001). In vivo observation of cavitation and embolism repair using magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiology 126(1):27-31.

Idris A, Rasaki K, Hodefe OJ, Hakeem B (2013). Consumption pattern of Ofada rice among civil servants in Abeokuta Metropolis of Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 3(6):106-112.

IRRI (2002). Standard evaluation system for rice. International Rice Research Institute, Philippine.

Izanloo A, Condon AG, Langridge P, Tester M, Schnurbusch T (2008). Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany 59(12):3327-3346.

Jones MP, Dingkuhn M, Aluko GK, Semon M (1997). Interspecific Oryza sativa L. x O. glaberrima Steud. progenies in upland rice improvement. Euphytica 94(2):237-246.

Kumar A, Singh DP (1998). Use of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in oilseed Brassica species. Annals of Botany 81(3):413-420.

Lang A (1983). Turgor-regulated translocation. Plant, Cell and Environment 6(9):683-689.

Lebkuecher J, Eichneier W (1990). Dessication-induced plant curling and high-irradiance damage in the desert resurrections plant Seaginella lepidophylla. Bulletin of Ecological Society of America 71: 227.

Lilley JM, Fukai S (1994). Effect of timing and severity of water deficit on four diverse rice cultivars I. Rooting pattern and soil water extraction. Field Crops Research 37(3):205-213.

Nageswara Rao RC, Talwar HS, Wright GC (2001). Rapid assessment of specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using a chlorophyll meter. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 186(3):175-182.

O’Toole JC, Cruz RT (1980). Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress. Plant Physiology 65(3):428-432.

Parker J (1968). Drought- resistance mechanisms. In: Kozlowski T (Ed) (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

Parry ML (2007). Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

Serraj R, Dimayuga D, Gowda V, Guan Y, Hong He, Impa S, Torres R (2008). Drought resistant rice: physiological framework for integrated research strategy. In: Serraj R, Bennett J, Hardy B (Eds). World Scientific Publishing.

Sheikholeslam SN, Currier HB (1977). Effect of water stress on turgor differences and 14C-assimilate movement in phloem of Ecballium elaterium. Plant Physiology 59(3):381-383.

Tardieu F (2013). Plant response to environmental conditions: assessing potential production, water demand and negative effects of water deficit. Frontiers in Physiology 4:1-17.

Venuprasad R, Cruz MS, Amante M, Magbanua R, Kumar A, Atlin GN (2008). Response to two cycles of divergent selection for grain yield under drought stress in four rice breeding populations. Field Crops Research 107(3):232-244.

Wopereis MCS, Diagne A, Rodenburg J, Sié M, Somado EA (2008). Why NERICA is a successful innovation for African farmers: A response to Orr et al. from the Africa Rice Center. Outlook on Agriculture 37(3):169-176.




How to Cite

FOFANA, M., SAKARIYAWO, L. S., POPOGBE, M. O., OYEKANMI, A. A., AZEEZ, J. O., & ADEGBEHINGBE, F. T. (2018). Physiological and Agronomic Responses of Four Rice Varieties to Drought in the Rainforest. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 10(2), 220–227.



Research articles
DOI: 10.15835/nsb10210187